Today's economy

Here’s why it’s so hard to find a good job

By Kevin Press, BrighterLife.ca

Comments (4)

A businessman is in a waiting room.I referenced a statistic last week published in a report by Scotiabank economist Erika Cain. Despite a sizeable drop in the Canadian unemployment rate since 2009 – from 8.3% then to 7.1% now — the percentage of Canadians who are employed is still considerably lower that it was before the recession. “Canada’s employment-to-population ratio at 61.8% in 2012 remains well below the pre-recession peak of 63.5% set in 2008,” wrote Cain. “Canada’s employment-generating capacity has been insufficient in providing enough jobs for a growing population and suggests that the jobless rate has improved in large part due to weaker labour force participation.”

I think Cain’s observation is an important one, so I called her on Friday to learn more. Statistics Canada reports that in 2008, when the employment-to-population ratio was 63.5%, the participation rate was 67.7%. That translated into an unemployment rate of 6.1%.

A year later, the employment-to-population ratio fell to 61.6%, the participation rate dropped to 67.1% and the unemployment rate jumped to 8.3%.

Even as the unemployment rate fell each subsequent year: to 8% in 2010, 7.4% in 2011 and 7.2% in 2012, the participation rate also fell. That number came in at 67% in 2010, 66.8% in 2011 and 66.7% in 2012.

“Canada has completely recovered all the [job] losses that were incurred during the recession and then some,” said Cain. “The unemployment rate has definitely come down due to employment growth, but also because there’s been a drop-out in the labour force.”

You can see this in the employment-to-population ratio, which hit a post-recession low of 61.6% in 2009 and 2010, and then crept up to 61.8% in 2011. It remained there last year.

“Obviously we are not creating enough jobs to keep pace with population growth,” Cain told me. “Even though employment growth in Canada has been relatively robust, relative to other industrialized nations it is still incomplete.”

That supports what we heard from TD Economics’ Diana Petramala last year. “The labour force isn’t growing as fast as it has in the past,” she told me. Petramala said Canada’s “poor productivity performance” is one of the reasons why. The Canadian economy’s productivity — our workers’ ability to produce economic value — has been falling in comparison to the U.S. economy for three decades. According to Deloitte Canada, our output per worker is about 86% of the U.S.’s.

It’s tempting to dismiss the weak participation rate as a short-term phenomenon. Young people are staying in school longer, and some Canadians have grown discouraged by a long, frustrating job hunt. Both factors will probably turn around as the economy strengthens.

That might not be in the near future though. If Canada is unable to improve its economic productivity, there will be more tough years ahead for job hunters.

Meanwhile, Cain said Scotiabank predicts a modest improvement in the employment-to-population ratio this year. Job growth will beat employment growth by 10 or 20 basis points, according to the bank. Economic growth in Canada is expected to come in at 1.7% this year.


Image of thw Sun Life whimsical sun - Money for Life Are you on track to meet your financial and retirement planning goals?
Having a plan to protect your family and build your savings now can help ensure you will have enough money to last through retirement. Ask your advisor about Sun Life Financial Money for Life.™ Don’t have an advisor? Visit Sun Life Financial Advisor Match to help you find one in your area.

Keep up to date on what’s happening in the capital markets and the real economy.
Subscribe to receive Today’s economy blog automatically by RSS or email.

al slinkard on

Your discusion of the falling “employment to population ratio” neglected to mention the fact that the average age of the Canadian population is increasing and thus the no of potntial employees is decreasing (disregarding immigrants).

Joe Nunes on

“lies, damn lies, and statistics” – Disraeli

I always worry when the statisticians (and that includes us actuaries) start throwing around statistics and then concluding that their is a trend and a conclusion and maybe even a policy prescription when really there is nothing but noise.

The reality is that the rate of change in society today is faster than ever and increasing all the time. This alone means that with so many moving pieces we can expect to see higher unemployment as people move from job to job as employer needs shift continuously.

A second reality is that many manufacturing jobs that were lost are never coming back – if the work comes back to Canada, it will in many instances be handed to a robot. I don’t worry nearly as much for the young, educated, technology savvy out there as I do for those in their 50s and 60s who have not prepared financially for retirement and have not updated their skills to be retained in the workforce.

Don’t worry about the numbers they don’t tell us nearly as much as you think.

John McMurray on

The need for higher productivity and the employment-to-population ratio point strongly to reducing immigration. As Joe points out manufacturing work is getting done by robots. The employee that can manage the robot has higher wages and much higher productivity than manual laborers. Just as families have gotten smaller (and richer) over time Canada would have higher per-capita wealth if we allowed our population to decline as well.

Retirement age should be increased by about 3 months per year for the next 20 years to 70. The current age of 65 was chosen when average life expectancy was about 62. Another way to look at it is retirement after working 48 years; from about age 17 to 65 in the past and now, with most people getting post secondary education, working from 23 to age 70.

Add a new comment:

Note: Please be sure to read our commenting policy and terms and conditions for this site. We reserve the right to delete any comments that we view to be in violation of our policy. The name you provide will appear next to your comment. Thank you!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Money for Life - Achieving lifetime financial security
Free newsletter subscription
Sun Life is Reader's Digest most-trusted life insurance brand

Connect to your Brighter Life